Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 7 results ...

Abdelrahman, M, Zayed, T and Elyamany, A (2008) Best-Value Model Based on Project Specific Characteristics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(03), 179–88.

Dabke, S, Salem, O, Genaidy, A and Daraiseh, N (2008) Job Satisfaction of Women in Construction Trades. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(03), 205–16.

Dossick, C S and Sakagami, M (2008) Implementing Web-Based Project Management Systems in the United States and Japan. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(03), 189–96.

Hanna, A S, Chang, C, Sullivan, K T and Lackney, J A (2008) Impact of Shift Work on Labor Productivity for Labor Intensive Contractor. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(03), 197–204.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords:
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(197)
  • Abstract:
    Generally, a contractor has three options in accelerating a construction schedule: working longer hours, increasing the number of workers, or creating an additional shift of workers. There has been a significant amount of research conducted on scheduled overtime on construction labor productivity. However, little information has been found in the literature addressing the labor inefficiency associated with working a second shift. This paper has qualitative and quantitative components. The qualitative part details why and how shift work affects labor productivity, and then addresses the appropriate use of shift work. The quantitative component determines the relationship between the length of shift work and labor efficiency. The results of the research show that shift work has the potential to be both beneficial and detrimental to the productivity of construction labor. Small amounts of well-organized shift work can serve as a very effective response to schedule compression. The productivity loss, obtained from the quantification model developed through this study, ranges from −11 to 17% depending on the amount of shift work used.

Laefer, D F and Manke, J P (2008) Building Reuse Assessment for Sustainable Urban Reconstruction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(03), 217–27.

Polat, G (2008) Factors Affecting the Use of Precast Concrete Systems in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(03), 169–78.

Zayed, T, Sharifi, M R, Baciu, S and Amer, M (2008) Slip-Form Application to Concrete Structures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(03), 157–68.